MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2382970620

Set based on Fractal Image Compression Method

2010· article· en· W2382970620 on OpenAlexaff
Wang Fang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractal compressionFractal transformImage compressionTexture compressionQuadtreeData compressionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceData compression ratioComputer visionCompression ratioCompression (physics)Lossless compressionColor Cell CompressionAlgorithmFractalImage (mathematics)Image processingMathematicsMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fractal image compression is an extremely promising image compression method,but because of its shorter development time,there are a number of problems remain to be solved,one of the more prominent is very long coding time and higher compression ratios reconstruction image quality is still not satisfactory. This article presents a new type of fractal image compression algorithm,based on the Julia set of fractal image compression method. The algorithm uses the Julia curves collection as the compression dictionary,using Adaptive QuadTree image compression. Through computer simulation results display,this algorithm has a high compression ratio and high image quality of Planar,encoding speed is also very obvious.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score0.713

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionFrench-language works237,207