MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383079352

Optical Correlation Detection and Identification of Low Contrast Targets Under Cluttered Background

2015· article· en· W2383079352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBandaoti guangdian · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceContrast (vision)Computer visionComputer scienceCorrelationHistogram equalizationPattern recognition (psychology)HistogramOptical correlatorFilter (signal processing)Tracking (education)Identification (biology)OpticsMathematicsImage (mathematics)Fourier transformPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical images detection,automatic identification,real-time tracking and precise positioning can be realized with hybrid optoelectronic joint transform correlator.However,when the practical target images have low contrasts and large background noises,the correlation peak contrast would be significantly reduced,even non correlation peaks appear.In this paper,the histogram equalization method combined with a low-pass filter in the spatial frequency domain was adopted.With this method,the image contrast is greatly improved,the background noises are reduced,and a sharp correlation peaks are obtained.The recognition problems of low-contrast target images under cluttered background are solved.Large amounts of computer simulations and optical experiments show that,compared to other complicated algorithms,this method owns simple algorithm,fast processing and good result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it