MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383096168

BOTANOGEOCHEMICAL ANOMALIES IN GONGPOQUAN AREA AND THEIR INDICATOR SIGNIFICANCE

2003· article· en· W2383096168 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Quality and Pollution
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogeochemical cycleCopperCopper oreGeologyProspectingVegetation (pathology)RavineMineralogyGeochemistrySoil scienceGeographyEnvironmental chemistryChemistryArchaeologyMetallurgyMaterials science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the biogeochemical method, the authors made regional botanogeochemical experimental researches in the Gongpoquan copper ore district of Beishan area. It is shown that some desert plants have good ore-indicating significance to some elements in their living environments, that the plants of that area demonstrate especially strong correlation with copper in Quaternary coarse fragments within ravines and valleys, and that their regional distribution also assumes some similarity. In some districts, plants are comparable with coarse fragments in contents of such elements as Zn, As and Co. It is also concluded that in vegetation survey of this area, Cu, Zn, Ag and Pb have ore-prospecting indicator significance, whereas Mo, As and Co have no special tracing significance for copper deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Quality and PollutionFrench-language works237,207