MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383116594

The Empirical Research on the Key Decision-making Factors of Foreign Countries’Implementing Countervailing Policy to China: Based on ASCM and the Data of Thirty-eight Countervailing files of Foreign Countries’ Implementing Countervailing Policy to China

2012· article· en· W2383116594 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhu Xiang-y

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Trade · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaSubsidyEmpirical researchKey (lock)International tradeBusinessForeign policyPolitical scienceEconomicsComputer scienceMarket economyPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures(ASCM) of WTO and by constructing BL assembled model of key macroscopical decision-making factors,this research draws the relevant conclusions by exerting the related data of United States,Canada,Australia,South Africa,India implementing 38 countervailing files from the year 2004 to 2009 and domestic macroeconomic development,and making an empirical research on the key macroscopical decision-making factors of foreign countries’ implementing countervailing policy to China.Conclusions,arguments and explanations are then made based on the study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.195
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of International TradeSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207