Actual strength of Korean Short Track Women's Team at the Vancouver Winter Olympics in 2010
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to explore the strength of the South Korean women's team of short-track skating that participate in the Vancouver Winter Olympic Games,it mainly used the ways of literature and video observation to analyze the situation of the training characteristics,and the performance of the new Korean women's team in major international competitions hosted by ISU at the last three years.The results showed that: 1) The selection match of South Korea national team is organized very well,highly competitive,and reflecting the competition purposes of fair and impartial,which is conducive to sustainable development of short-track speed skating.2) The new members inherit the older members' features;most of the members have a strong long-range power,while the short-range strength is weaker.3) South Korea team members' training load is heavy,and the training is targeted.South Korea women's team is still a major obstacle to Chinese at the Vancouver Winter Olympics.Recommendations: Takeing advantage of the opportunity that South Korea are training overseas in July,we should do a good job on the research of South Korea and take specific countermeasures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".