Management of Relationship Conflict:The Moderating Effects of Team Efficacy and Team Emotional Intelligence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Relationship conflict is one of the inevitable phenomenon of the interactive processes in work teams,meaning that it is important to pay more attention to relationship conflict management.The present study integrates contingency theory,social cognitive theories and emotion theories to examine the effects of relationship conflict,team efficacy and team emotional intelligence on team performance.The results based on 68 teams show that relationship conflict is negatively related to team performance,whereas team efficacy and team emotional intelligence significantly improves team performance.Furthermore,team efficacy plays as an important moderator between relationship conflict and team performance,which means relationship conflict has a strong negative impact on team performance in low efficacy teams and the negative effect disappears in high efficacy teams.However,the moderating effect of team emotional intelligence on the relationship between relationship conflict and performance is not significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it