MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383283439

NUMERICAL EVALUATION METHOD OF SCHEME ON EXPLORING OF CERTAIN WATER SOURCE SITE IN XINJIANG

2008· article· en· W2383283439 on OpenAlexaff
Wei-Min Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueGansu Geology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Modeling and Analysis
Canadian institutionsAecom (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterGeologyGroundwater flowProcess (computing)Scheme (mathematics)Computer simulationGroundwater modelWater sourceHydrology (agriculture)Mining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringAquiferEnvironmental scienceWater resource managementComputer scienceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article,the two-dimensional flow groundwater numerical model calculation method is adopted for predicting exploration of the groundwater level at certain water source site.Besides,the establishing process and the evaluating process of the numerical model of the groundwater are introduced,so as to provide the scientific basis for determining the scheme on exploring of the proposed water source site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGansu GeologySame topicGeological Modeling and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207