MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383343584

The Legal Analysis on GATT Article 20 Invoked in China's Export Restriction Measures on Various Raw Materials

2011· article· en· W2383343584 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gong Bai-hu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Trade Organization Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppealChinaAccessionTransparency (behavior)International tradeProtocol (science)Raw dataInternational economicsLaw and economicsEconomicsBusinessPolitical scienceLawComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The case regarding China's export measures on various raw materials is notable and latest to China's WTO dispute settlement.The case involves the legal issues of the legal application of the Protocol on the Accession,the WTO exception,the principle of judicial economy and the transparency.This paper outlines the basic facts and conclusions based on the major findings of the panel.We analyze the findings on whether China can invoke the GATT Article 20 to the Protocol,and how to apply it.This paper argues that although the success rate invoked is very low generally,China should seek to clarify legal basis on appeal when it invokes the GATT Article 20 to the Protocol Article 11.3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicWorld Trade Organization LawFrench-language works237,207