MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383343678

INDUSTRIAL HEMP A TRILLION- DOLLAR CROP

2015· article· en· W2383343678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dr.Kalaivani R

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Journal of Economics & Business Studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCassava research and cyanide
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureLiberian dollarCropBusinessAgricultural economicsGreen RevolutionAgroforestryIndustrial RevolutionChinaGeographyEconomicsEnvironmental scienceForestry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There is a necessity to deeply transform the agriculture sector. Farmers earn low income from agriculture and the irregular weather turn their crops to dust. Hence there is an impulse to bring agriculture revolution for sustainable development. On searching on the solutions, an industrial hemp- Cannabis sativa, a low cost annual crop might be considered as a trillion dollar super crop. Hemp was our first agricultural crop, and remained the planet's largest crop. Its cultivation not requires chemicals, pesticides and can be grown in rotation with other crops. Hemp farming is completely sustainable. Today hemp is being cultivated mostly by China, Hungary, England, Canada, Australia, France, Italy, Spain, Holland, Germany, Poland, Romania, Russia, Ukraine, India and throughout Asia. There is currently renewed interest in once again growing this versatile crop. While hemp faces significant legal obstacles due to its close relationship to the marijuana plant, there are a number of states, are moving toward reviving the hemp industry. This review paper is intended to highlight the core of highbrow commercial plant, the industrial hemp and its impact on ecosystem. In addition to that it will provide a platform to focus more to cultivatesucharesourcefulplant. Key: agriculture, revolution, hemp, commercial, sustainable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.491
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.100 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Journal of Economics & Business StudiesSame topicCassava research and cyanideFrench-language works237,207