Characteristics of Sediment Yield and Supplying Pattern of the Laohahe Drainage Basin in Liaoning Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the research on soil erosion of the Laohahe Drainage Basin in Liaoning Province, the spatial distribution of sediment delivery ratio of each morphological unit is determined by calculating sediment travel time, thus the final sediment yield is acquired. The result indicates that Laoguandi, Haladaokou, Shaoguoyingzi, etc in the northern part and both sides of the rivers in the middle and southern parts are the major sources of sediment yield. The mathematical model of sediment-supplying is established by choosing slope, vegetation coverage, land-use types, soil erodability, distance to the rivers and lithology of basement rocks as influencing factors, which reveals that the sediment yield is intimately related to slope, distance to rivers, land-use types and vegetation coverage. Thus, changing land-use types and/or increasing vegetation coverage is the key measure for disaster sediment. The result is helpful to the management of land-use and prevention of disaster sediment in the Laohahe Drainage Basin in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".