MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383414696

AN EFFICIENT PLANT REGENERATION SYSTEM VIA DIRECT ADVENTITIOUS BUD FORMATION IN CHICORY

2006· article· en· W2383414696 on OpenAlexaff
Jia Jing-fen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant tissue culture and regeneration
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExplant cultureSucroseVascular bundleCichoriumBotanyCallusBiologyBasal shootSeedlingAuxinHorticultureChemistryIn vitroFood scienceBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient plant regeneration system through direct adventitious bud formation is established using leaf segments of asepsis seedlings of chicory(Cichorium intybus L.).After 5~7d of culture,adventitious buds appeared directly from explants without any intervening callus on Murashige and Skoog(MS) medium supplemented with different concentrations of N-6-benzyladenine(BA) alone or together with 0.5mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid(NAA).According to histological observations,adventitious buds were originated from thin wall cell of vascular bundle of the leafs,and the vascular bundle systems of adventitious buds are closely connected with that of leaf explant.6-BA was necessary for direct adventitious bud formation.The frequency and number of adventitious bud formation were strongly influenced by the development stage of explants and sucrose concentration.After 15 days culture,the 100% frequency of bud formation as well as an average of 36~38 adventitious buds per explant were obtained on MS medium supplemented with 2.0mg/L 6-BA,0.5mg/L NAA,100mg/L Vc,100mg/L V_(B1),300mg/L proline and 40 g/L sucrose using 20-day-old leaves.When transplanted and cultured for about 10d on the 1/2 MS medium added 0.5mg/L indole-3-butyric acid(IBA), 97.58% rooting frequency was obtained.Plantlets grew well and appeared normal with no mortality after transfer to soil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear Agricultural SciencesSame topicPlant tissue culture and regenerationFrench-language works237,207