MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383498475

Relationship between foreign TBT and Recall of China's consumer products

2013· article· en· W2383498475 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueShanghai Textile Science & Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecallAnticipation (artificial intelligence)ChinaEconometricsEconomicsPsychologyGeographyComputer scienceCognitive psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper,a model called Weight Regression and Forecasting among Econometrics was applied to evaluate the relationship between the number of recalled China's consumer products exported to EU,USA and Canada during 2005.1 ~ 2012.7 and the number of global TBT announced.Results show that non-linear quantity mechanism between TBT and number of recalls exists,and R-squared is 0.9825.In this model,the amount of monthly global consumer products recall showed positive correlation with an increase of 26.8%.Also,the amount of monthly global consumer products recall showed positive correlation with the amount of global announced TBT in the same and the next month,with an increase of about 79.6%.Our research indicates an anticipation of consumer products recall that will continue to increase,with inertia effect.Although,the TBT has kind of lagged effect on recall amounts,the anticipation of China's consumer products recall will not be reduced to a certain extent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it