Emotional processing traits for college students with different alexithymia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the emotional processing characteristics for college students with different alexithymia in order to supply scientific evidence for intervention of this disorder. Methods: 785 college students received measurement of emotional processing styles with Emotional Processing Scale( EPS,Chinese version),and the results were compared with normal controls. Results: The scoring on Toronto Alexithymia Scale( TAS),together with its subordinate components,was significantly higher in students with high alexithymia disorder compared to the normal controls( P 0. 01). SingleImpoverished emotional experiencecould predict the degree of alexithymia in students with lower scores on TAS,whereas combined components ofImpoverished emotional experience,Signs of unprocessed emotionsandSuppressioncould effectively estimate extent of alexithymia in those with higher scores.Conclusion: Emotional processing deficits may be responsible for college students with alexithymia,andImpoverished emotional experiencecan be the most important factors that affect the development of alexithymia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".