MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383965789

A Review of Researches and Revelations of the Acquisition of Concepts as a Transition Learning

2002· review· en· W2383965789 on OpenAlex
Pei Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Northwest Normal University · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Assessment
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransition (genetics)Value (mathematics)CognitionPsychologyCognitive scienceCognitive psychologyEpistemologyComputer sciencePhilosophyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The acquisition of concepts as a transition lear ning constitutes a d omain of psychological research into the origin and the development law of the h uman cognition(especially the human learning).The article sums up this kind of r esearches in terms of their origins and founders,their value as well as their de velopments.Meanwhile,in summarizing the related experiments performed in those r esearches,the article will explain the cognitive characteristics of the acquisit ion of concepts as a transition learning,and make some suggestions about reform in mathematics instruction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.793
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it