MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2383980077

Carbon fiber paper fabricated by CVD for application of proton exchange membrane fuel cell

2008· article· en· W2383980077 on OpenAlex
Jun Guo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Central South University(Science and Technology) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFiber-reinforced polymer composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostructureMaterials scienceElectrical resistivity and conductivityComposite materialChemical vapor depositionCarbon fibersPorosityFiberNanotechnologyComposite numberElectrical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PAN based carbon fiber paper(CFP)preform was fabricated using nonwoven fabrics method,and carbon fiber paper was obtained through chemical vapor deposition(CVD)technology and graphitization process at 2 000℃.The microstructures of CFP and its preform were observed by SEM and PLM,and the graphitization degree of CFP was determined by XRD.The electrical performances were measured using the four-probe technique.The results indicate that the as-prepared CFP preform by nonwoven fabrics method has a network structure with randomly accumulated carbon fibers and well-dispersed porosity.The results show that pyrocarbon through CVD process has rough laminar microstructure,and carbon fibers in the CFP are compactly connected by pyrocarbon.The average graphitization degree of CFP is up to 82.2%which is higher than those of Japan Toray CFP and Canada Ballard CFP.Pyrocarbon from CVD process improves electrical performance of CFP greatly,the through-plane electrical resistivity of the CFP is 33.3 mΩ.cm,while those of Toray and Ballard CFP are 45.2 and 135.9 mΩ.cm,respectively;the in-plane electrical resistivity of the CFP is 6.0 mΩ.cm,while those of Toray and Ballard CFP are 6.4 and 16.3 mΩ.cm,respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it