On the Aesthetic Characteristics of Internet Art in Web 3.0 Era
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entering into the Web3.0 Era,the essential difference from the traditional art can no longer be ignored in examining internet art.Also,we need a more thorough thinking on the fusion of the technology characteristics and transmission characteristics of the internet.Therefore,the main logical origin of this essay is to break the disciplinary boundaries,and form a research vision in which art,communication,aesthetics are fused.From the perspective of Lasswell's communication model,which is,Who(says),What(to),Whom(in),What Channel(with),What Effect,through deep analysis,we can find five aesthetic characteristics of internet art.They are:the interactivity between internet's aesthetic speech and its audiences,the hypertextuality of internet's aesthetic form,the hypermedia of internet's aesthetic transmission,and the invented reality of internet's aesthetic effects.After identifying the internet's aesthetic characteristics,we should make better use of its aesthetic rules and construct more aesthetic contexts for the audiences in daily life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it