Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To explore the family environmental characteristics, alexithymia and the relationship between them in female heroin addict inmates in Reform Institute through Labor and Education. Methods: 165 female heroin addict inmates in Reform Institute through Labor and Education (study group) were assessed with Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), Family Environment Scale-Chinese version (FES-CV). Results: Compared with the control group, study group had significant total TAS scores, and had higher scores in subscales of the TAS and FES-CV(except of Active-Recreational Orientation and Indepedence subscales)(p0.01 or p0.05). Some subscale scores showed significant correlations between TAS and FES-CV (p0.01or p0.05). Conclusion: There are many deficits in the family environment and severe alexithymia in female heroin addict inmates in Reform Institute through Labor and Education. Alexithymia may be a kind of diathesis of addict members, and there are significant associations between some subscales of family environment and alexithymia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".