A Comparative Analysis of the Participatory Scheme of Ecomuseums:Cases of the Ecomusée de la Haute-Beauce,Canada and the Soga Ecomuseum,China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ecomuseums are experimental products of museums practices inspired by the New Museology.They focus on public relationship,which is what traditional museums lack,and encourage community participation.The Ecomusee de la Haute-Beauce in Quebec,Canada and the Soga Ecomuseum in Guizhou,China differ from each other in forms as well as the social and cultural environments they are within.The ecomuseum of Haute-Beauce regards the museum as a tool for public education and attempts to promote the community development by expanded participation of local people.Its over-distributed power and authority,however,caused some fake participation.The Soga Ecomuseum,located in a less-developed area of china,places more focus on economic development rather than cultural preservation.Tourism is closely tied to the museum's operation and public participation is greatly restricted.The ecomuseum practice in China differs from that of western countries where the local community is the focus and a self-development structure is adopted.More attention on public participation is called for and a participatory scheme of Chinese style is expected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".