MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Man with subjective complaints but abnormal CSF

2011· book-chapter· en· W238425882 on OpenAlexaff
Machiel Pleizier, Philip Scheltens

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 65-year-old technical worker with previous management function had been unable to work because of pulmonary problems for 7 years. He visited the memory clinic because of slowly progressive memory complaints over the past year, concerning names of familiar people and recent facts. Things get lost and difficulty with multitasking was observed by others. No interference with daily functioning is reported and he denies depressive symptoms. His wife and children confirm memory complaints, but they also noticed changes in behavior. In increasingly common conflict situations the patient sometimes uses verbal and physical violence. There are numerous life events, such as the undesired cessation of work and some other private circumstances, but the patient is reported to show no emotion, while a marked character change is denied by the spouse. General history This highly educated man had been diagnosed with extrinsic allergic alveolitis 7 years ago. He has used prednisolone in the past and now only uses fluticasone inhaler if necessary. Neurologic evaluation 5 years ago, because of black-outs during car driving, revealed no abnormalities. His electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were reported to be normal. He stopped smoking 7 years ago and uses three units alcohol daily. Patient lives with his wife and has two children and three grandchildren. Family history The patient’s father suffered from dementia in his 70s and died 8 years after onset of symptoms. No specific diagnosis was made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research→French-language works237,207→