MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2384364717

Research on the Biological Characters of the Seeds of Marsdenia tenacissima

2014· article· en· W2384364717 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Meng Heng-lin

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationDormancyAbsorption of waterWater contentHorticultureBiologyTransverse diameterSeed dormancyAgronomyBotanyAnimal scienceAnatomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studied on morphological characteristics,water absorption,water content,viability and germination characteristics through seeds of M. tenacissima handled with different hormones and different concentrations to analyze the biological characteristics of seeds to lay the foundation for cultivating high quality seedlings. The results showes that the fruit of M. tenacissim was follicles that contained( 24. 03 ± 0. 29) grains. The longitudinal diameter and transverse diameter were( 80. 84 ± 2. 07) mm and( 11. 22 ± 0. 29) mm. The thousand seed weight was( 22. 82 ± 0. 024) g and seed moisture content was 7. 93%. There had no dormancy characteristic that belonged to normal type seed. 150 mg /L GA3could improved the germination rate of seed significantly,others hormone treatment did not.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicPhytochemistry and Bioactive CompoundsFrench-language works237,207