MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2384445891

Research on MAS based CWE extraction framework

2007· article· en· W2384445891 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaobo Peng, Feng Ping, Jue Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Engineering and Applications Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)Representation (politics)MachiningDistributed computingExtraction (chemistry)EngineeringMechanical engineeringOperating systemChemistryChromatography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cutter/Workpiece Engagement (CWE) extraction is an important problem in virtual machining. B-rep model based CWE calculation has a high computational overhead especially for complicated workpieces. This paper presents a multi-agent system(MAS) for B-rep based CWE extraction that allows distributed processing. Structures of the framework and the agents are specified. An ACL compatible message structure is used for the communications between agents in the framework. A hierarchical structure is presented for the representation of geometric entities involved in CWE calculations. Finally a prototype implementation and an example are giv en to show the effectiveness and efficiency of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Engineering and Applications JournalSame topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207