MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2384457926

Ore-Forming Environmental Indicator Minerals from the Sullivan Giant Pb-Zn-Ag Ore Deposit, Canada

2000· article· en· W2384457926 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yao-Hui Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal of China Universitiesf · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourmalineBiotiteGeologyGeochemistryClastic rockIlmeniteTitaniteMineralogyProterozoicSphaleriteFeldsparSulfideZirconChemistrySedimentary rockQuartzPyrite
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sullivan Pb-Zn-Ag deposit (British Columbia, Canada) is a classic SEDE X-type massive sulfide deposit, which occurs conformably within clastic metased i mentary rocks of the Middle Proterozoic Aldridge Formation. Several typical mine rals from this deposit are studied, including B-rich (tourmaline), Cl-rich (sc apolite and biotite), Ba-rich (feldspar and mica), and Mn-rich (garnet, chlori te, carbonate and ilmenite) minerals. Tourmaline shows a wide variation of chemi cal compositions, from Mg-rich dravite to Fe-rich schorl and Ca-rich uvite. T he δ- 11B values of the tourmalines are from-11.1 to-2.9‰, which is si milar to the range (-15.4 to-1.7‰) found worldwide in tourmalines from mass ive sulfide deposits and tourmalinites in dominantly clastic metasedimentary ter ranes. Multiple stages of tourmaline formation are distinguished in the Sullivan deposit. Cl-rich scapolites occur in the bedded sulfide ores at Sullivan. The scapolite porphyro blasts are more Ca-rich (EqAn= 40.8~50.9) and Cl-poor (X Cl= 0.38~0.54) than t he fine-grained euhedral scapolite crystals (EqAn= 22.4~35.1 and X Cl= 0. 72~0.8 1) in the same sample. Cl-rich biotites are found only in the bedded sulfide or e s with 0.76 to 1.46 wt% Cl and a limited variation of Mg/(Mg+Fe) ratios (0.34~ 0.37). Other biotites are commonly Cl-poor (0.2 wt%Cl) and have a wider range of Mg/(Mg+Fe) ratios (0.24~0.69). Ba-rich feldspar and muscovite with BaO up to 6.8 wt% also occur within the bedded sulfide ores in association with to urmaline, carbonates, and sulfides. Mn-rich garnets (up to 79% end-member spe ss artine) at Sullivan constitute coticules (spessartine-quartz rocks) and spessar t ine-rich tourmalinites; they also disseminated in sulfide ores and other countr y rocks. Other Mn-rich minerals include chlorite (up to 4.7 wt% MnO), carbonate s (up to 30 wt% MnO), and ilmenite (up to 16.7 wt% MnO). It is suggested that th e existences of aforementioned B-, Cl-, Ba-, and Mn-rich minerals at Sulliva n ar e indicative of possible non-marine evaporite involvement in the ore-forming s ys tem and the bedded sulfide ores were likely precipitated in a dense brine pool i n the Proterozoic sea floor at Sullivan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Journal of China Universitiesf→Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→