Synthesis,structure and performance characterization of cellulose-based conductive hydrogel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A kind of novel MCC/PPy composite hydrogel has been prepared using the cross-linking network of microcrystalline cellulose(MCC)as the matrix of the hydrogel,which was dissolved in ionic liquid(chloride-1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium,BMIMCl)and cross-linked by N,N-methylene-bis-arcylamide,and pyrrole(Py)as the monomer of conductive polymer.The chemical structure and morphology of the MCC/PPy composite hydrogel were characterized by FT-IR and SEM,meanwhile,the conductivity,swelling ratio and thermal stability were studied.Results showed that the MCC/PPy composite hydrogel was semi-IPN conductive hydrogel with honeycomb-like structure.Conductivity of the composite hydrogel was between 10-4-10-3 S/cm,and doping of TsONa increased the conductivity significantly.The equilibrium swelling ratio(ESR)decreased with higher MCC content for both pure MCC hyrogel and the composite hydrogel;and ESR of the composite hydrogel could maintain at the level of 500% which was lower than that of the pure MCC hydrogel.Besides,the thermal stability of the composite hydrogel was reduced than the pure MCC hydrogel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".