MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2384624963

The correlation of depression and cognitive function with poststroke in different period

2013· article· en· W2384624963 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shen Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Brain and Nervous Diseases · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamdHamilton depression scaleDepression (economics)Montreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineIntervention (counseling)Rating scalePhysical therapyPsychologyCognitionInternal medicinePsychiatryCognitive impairmentSignificant differenceDevelopmental psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To observe the correlation of depression and cognitive function with poststroke in different time and guide clinical monitoring and intervention.Methods Two hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients with stroke within 72 hours of symptom onset were included.The patients were scored by Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD;24-item version) after 72h of symptom onset.The patients whose score(HAMD) were ≥8 were randomly allocated into intervention group and non-intervention group.The patients whose score were ≤8 were scored by HAMD again at the time one month and whose HAMD score were≥8 were randomly allocated into intervention group and non-intervention group again.The same as before,the patients whose HAMD score≤8 were scored by HAMD at the time three month and allocated into HAMD score≥8 and HAMD score≤8.ALL patients were scored by MoCa scale score and P300 detection at the time 72h and three month.The MoCa scale score and P300 detected at the time 72h and three month were analyzed in the patients with poststroke depression(PSD) who were allocated into non-ntervention groups.Results ①MoCa scale score was compared at the time 72 hour and 3 month among every on-ntervention group.The MoCa scale score of patients at the time 72hour was different from the patients at the same time period 1,2 and 3 month(P 0.01).The MoCa scale score of the patients who were randomly allocated into on-ntervention group at the time 72 hour was different between 72hour and 3month(P 0.05),and the same as the MoCa scale score of the patients who were randomly allocated into on-ntervention group at the time 1,2 and 3 month(P 0.01).② P300 was compared at the time 72 hour and 3 month among every on-ntervention group.The P300 of the patients whom were randomly allocated into on-ntervention group at the time 1month and 2month were different from the 72hour and 3 month significantly.The P300 of the patients both who were randomly allocated into on-ntervention group at the time 1month and 2month were different between 72hour and 3month(P 0.01).Conclusion Varying degrees of cognitive impairment in the patients with PSD by MoCa scale testing,and it is obvious in sub-acute phase and recovery phase,but the accuracy,authenticity of the score subject to certain restrictions.The cognitive impairment of the patients with PSD which happens at the time 1month and 2 month is more pronounced.So regular screening to the patients with PSD is needed.Early intervention is needed and it can improve the prognosis of patients overall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Brain and Nervous DiseasesSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207