MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2384626298

Influence of Light,Temperature and Salinity on Seed Germination of Flaveria bidentis(Compositae),a New Exotic Plant

2008· article· en· W2384626298 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Ren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChromatography in Natural Products
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationSalinityBiologyRadicleAgronomyHorticultureBotanyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flaveria bidentis,an annual weed of Flaveria(Compositae),had been newly discovered in China.It might be a potential invasive plant in that of its very strong reproductive and survival abilities.Morphology and surface character of the seed were measured,and seed germination characteristics of this exotic species were examined from temperature,light,salinity to seed soaking aspects.The results showed that:the seed of F.bidentis were adapted well to high temperature and germinated rapidly at 35℃.Its germination percentage,germination index and vigor index were increased with the temperature rose.The germination percentage was affected little by light,while germination peak was delayed,and germination and vigor indexes of the seed were reduced with the prolonged light time.Salinity stress had significant effect on seed germination of F.bidentis:the germination percentage and peak decreased gradually with the increasing of NaCl concentration,while the germination and vigor indexes of the seed were higher than those of the control under 0.01 mol/L and 0.05 mol/L NaCl stress.Lower NaCl stress promoted the elongation of the radicle.Seed soaking also had notable impact on seed germination.In all,it was suggested that,the extremely high germinability and preference to salinity of the seeds of Flaveria bidentis could be closely related with its strong invasiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChromatography in Natural ProductsFrench-language works237,207