MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2384687476

Intelligent Intrusion Detection Research Based on BP Neural Network

2011· article· en· W2384687476 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Sensor Networks and IoT
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceIntrusion detection systemInternet Control Message ProtocolNetwork packetArtificial neural networkComputer networkAnomaly-based intrusion detection systemTransmission Control ProtocolProtocol (science)Network securityHost-based intrusion detection systemReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceIntrusion prevention system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes the role and status of the intrusion detection technology in computer network security technology,as well as applying the BP neural network algorithm to the intrusion detection technology.An intelligent intrusion detection system based on BP neural network is established.The system captures packets in the network transmission by the packet capture module real-timely,then identifies the protocol that the packet uses in the protocol analysis module,respectively,and processes the packet using TCP,UDP and ICMP independently in the BP neural network module.This paper also gives in the simulation results in Matlab07 to prove that intelligent intrusion detection system based on BP neural network c can effectively enhance the identification rate of intrusion detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it