Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine Therapy on Periarthritis of Shoulder with 42 Cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Observe influence of integrated traditional Chinese medicine therapy to near-term curative effect and patients' quality of lives in treating periarthritis of shoulder. Method: One hundred and three patients were divided into acupuncture and moxibustion group( 29 cases),manipulation group( 32 cases) and comprehensive treatment group( 42 cases) with Bushen Xuanning decoction,acupuncture and moxibustion and manipulation therapy according to different therapy methods,each group's patients received corresponding method of therapy and total course of treatment were 22 days. Before and after treatment, short-form McGill pain questionnaire( SF-MPQ) of Constant-Murley and McGill were made and world health organization quality of life assessment instrument brief version( WHOQOL-BREF) was graded. Result: The total clinical effective rate of curative effect in the comprehensive treatment group was 97. 6% superior to 72. 4% in the acupuncture and moxibustion group and 78. 1% in the manipulation group( P 0. 05). After treatment,compared with the time before treatment,scores of dimensionality( pain,range of joint passive motion,muscle strength and functional activities) of Constant-Murley in three groups increased( P 0. 01),and scores of pain,range of joint passive motion and functional activities in comprehensive treatment group were higher than those in acupuncture and moxibustion group and manipulation group( P 0. 01). Scores of dimensionality of SF-MPQ and total scores in comprehensive treatment group were lower than those in acupuncture and moxibustion group and manipulation group( P 0.01). Scores of subject feeling of physiology,mentality,environment,social relations and quality of life and health status in comprehensive treatment group were higher than those in acupuncture and moxibustion group and manipulation group( P 0. 01). Conclusion: Integrated traditional Chinese medicine therapy can ameliorate pain of periarthritis of shoulder in chronic phase and ameliorate range of joint passive motion functional activities,it improved patients' quality of lives,there is a significant near-term clinical curative effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".