Study on Circumferential Uniformity of Forward Warhead Fragment Dispersion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For obtaining the factor influencing circumferential uniformity of forward-warhead fragment dispersion,circumferential dispersion uniformity difference of two detonation modes were described quantificationally by simulation and static explosion experiment,which are detonating at one center point and detonating synchronously at four points. The research shows that if the warhead is detonated synchronously at four points,there will be four fragments convergence areas at the orientations near detonation points,and the average difference is merely 3. 825°. Mechanism analyzing indicates that the blast waves rooting from each points overlap at the orientations between detonation points,and the overlapped wave is stronger than their sides. So the fragments at overlapped wave orientations are pushed aside when accelerated fiercely. As a result,fragments at detonation point orientations are denser comparatively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it