MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2384905974

Soft Information,Core Competitive Edge and Private Relationship Lending

2011· article· en· W2384905974 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Song Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAnhui nongye kexue · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessCore (optical fiber)Quarter (Canadian coin)Competitive advantageQuality (philosophy)RationalityRural areaMarketingGeographyTelecommunicationsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

针对村镇银行的发展问题,通过引入私法关系型借贷的理论概念,论证了软信息的作用、村镇银行搜集软信息的渠道以及在中国农村社区重情轻理的人文环境下村镇银行的私法关系型借贷机制。并根据核心竞争优势的识别标准,从理论上推导出村镇银行的核心竞争优势是私法关系型借贷:首先,村镇银行这类中小型社区银行开展私法关系型借贷具有比较优势;其次,村镇银行基于软信息的私法关系型借贷业务更受中小客户青睐;最后,村镇银行的私法关系型借贷实现了范围经济。进而剖析了村镇银行没有发挥出核心竞争优势的原因:一是村镇银行自身未能发现其核心竞争优势是私法关系型借贷;二是村镇银行建立私法关系型借贷的内在动力不足;三是村镇银行发展私法关系型借贷业务的准备不足。并提出了相应的政策建议:转变理念,积极发展私法关系型借贷;加强培训,提高从业人员的专业素质;强化监管,防止从业人员的违规行为;借鉴经验,完善村镇银行私法关系型借贷机制。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnhui nongye kexue→Same topicFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance→French-language works237,207→