Characteristics of Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Mirabilis jalapa with Different Colors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mirabilis jalapa is one invasive plant widely distributed in China,also is an usual courtyard flower with abundant colors. The seeds of M. jalapa with different colors as materials,basic characteristics,seed germination and seedling growth were investigated by laboratory bioassays to explore the differences of biological characteristics among them. The results showed that,the diameters( 4. 79 mm,4. 61 mm) and thousand seed weight( 59. 29 g) of the seeds for compound color were less than the seeds for white,yellow and purple red significantly( p 0. 05); the final germination rates of the seeds for white and purple red were the highest( both higher than 80%),but the final germination rate of the seeds for compound color was the lowest( only41%); seedling root length for compound color( 36. 15 mm) was significantly less than that of other three colors( p 0. 05),but there was no significant differences among four colors in seedling lateral root number,dry weight of overground part and total weight. The differences of seed germination and seedling growth of the seeds for different colors mean their different adaption strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".