MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2385279175

Study on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Diurnal Course of the Endangered Species Paeonia ludlowii

2013· article· en· W2385279175 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaozhong Lan

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotosynthesisTranspirationHorticultureBotanyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research,the most advanced system for portable photosynthesis system-Li-cor-6400 was used in Paeonia ludlowii which was one kind of rare and endangered species.The diurnal course of net photosynthetic rate of P.ludlowii showed a single peak in natural environment conditions,which reached a peak at 11:30 O'clock.There existed no midday depression in its photosynthesis.At 12:30 O'clock,the value of stoma limitation and water pressure saturation deficits of leaf reached their peaks,while water use efficiency was not high,with a highest value appearing at 10:30 O'clock.The maximum value of apparent quantum yield appeared at 10:30 O'clock.However,the climax value of transpiration rate appearing at 12:30 O'clock,was not coordinate in time with maximum value of photosynthetic rate,which showed that lots of factors affected photosynthetic rate of P.ludlowii under special climate factors in Tibet.In the diurnal course of photosynthetic rate of P.ludlowii,high value [over 4.00 μmol/(m2·s)] had kept on for 9 hours or so,which was very easy for P.ludlowii to accumulate photosynthetic products,and it showed that P.ludlowii was a type of light plant.Generally,it offered scientific foundation for taming medical or ornamental plant of wild Ranunculaceae Paeonia by studying the photosynthetic characteristics and diurnal course of P.ludlowii.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeedSame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207