Bibliographic record
Abstract
ObjectiveTo investigate the alexithymia of patients with depressive episode and analyze the relationship between alexithymia and depression, anxiety. MethodA total of 172 patients with depressive episode(CCMD-3) and 172 control subjects completed the TAS-20,the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale(CES-D) and the state-trait anxiety inventory(STAI). ResultThe scores of TAS-20,CES-D and STAI were all higher in depressive patients than in control. 42.4% of patients with depressive episode were considered alexithymia, but only 9.9% in control. In depressive patients, the alexithymia got higher scores in CES-D than the nonalexithymia. The total score and the first factor of TAS-20 were correlated with CES-D and STAI significantly. ConclusionThe patients with depressive episode have significant alexithymia, and alexithymia is an independent construct from depression and anxiety, though they may be closely related.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".