MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2385320944

An Improved Text Classification Results of the Improved Manifold Learning Algorithm

2011· article· en· W2385320944 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lian Shun-jin

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNonlinear dimensionality reductionEmbeddingManifold (fluid mechanics)Construct (python library)Artificial intelligenceEuclidean geometryCategorizationText categorizationAlgorithmField (mathematics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Euclidean distanceManifold alignmentMachine learningMathematicsDimensionality reduction
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manifold learning algorithms play an important part in the field of pattern recognition.In this paper,we propose a based on neighbors selecting modified Local Linear Embedding algorithm,which uses the weighted Euclidean distance to construct the local neighborhood of the text data to improve text classification recognition rate.At the same time,we use the Semi-Supervised Locally Linear Embedding algorithm to improve the text classification.Experiments show that the text-based manifold learning algorithms that can improve the text categorization effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207