Effects of Mei colitis and enema soup on interleukin-6,interleukin-10 and malondialdehyde of ulcerative colitis rats
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To explore the part of mechanism of action of Mei colitis and enema soup on treatment of ulcerative colitis.Methods: Experimental rats were randomly divided into the blank group,the model group,low,middle,high dose drug group,10 respectively;Using radiation immunifaction method to measure serum IL-6,IL-10,using colorimetric method to measure MDA.Results: The IL-6,IL-10 and MDA content of the blank group and model group has statistically significant difference(P0.01),while the drug groups and model group also has statistically significant difference(P0.01).and the blank group was not statistically significant difference;The IL-6 of high dose group was higher than low dose group,the MDA of low dose group was more than high dose group,the difference was significant(P0.05),and the latter was negatively correlated with increase of dose;IL-10 was positively associated with increase of dose,but there was not significant difference of the different dose group.Conclusion: Mei colitis and enema soup can significantly reduce IL-6,MDA,rise IL-10 level,has good curative effect on ulcerative colitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it