MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2385609695 · doi:10.6844/ncku.2010.00078

The Online Experiment on Ethical Perception and Behavior Intention: Empirical Research on Social Networking and Search Engine Tools

2010· article· zh· W2385609695 on OpenAlex
慕斯華

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue成功大學國際經營管理研究所碩士班學位論文 · 2010
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionThe InternetPsychologyInternet privacySocial psychologyEmpirical researchAdvertisingWorld Wide WebComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, online users use the Internet for many major services. Almost all of these services are either directly fulfilled by Google’s search engines (Google and YouTube) or through social networks such as Facebook. This paper examines these two major online services with regards to users’ ethical perceptions of these large online services along with users’ behavior intentions. The results showed that behavior intention and ethical perception concerns can be predicted based on self-regulation, information privacy and trust. Stimulus was then given in the form of negative news articles to the experimental group and resulted in varying results. A cross cultural examination also took place as respondents were mostly composed of either Canadian or Taiwanese.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.710
GPT teacher head0.620
Teacher spread0.090 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it