MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2385618335

REALIZATION AND APPLICATION OF MATTER - ELEMENT COMPLETE INFORMATIONMEASUREMENT ALGORITHM

2005· article· en· W2385618335 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Decision-Making Techniques
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealization (probability)Function (biology)Element (criminal law)AlgorithmSet (abstract data type)Measure (data warehouse)MathematicsWeight functionComputer scienceData miningStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Definition of the trueness and avail dependent function and weight factor in matter - elementcomplete information algorithm are directly linked to its validity. For this reason, improved dependent functioncalculation formulas were recommended to calculate the concerned dependent function. Further, consistentdecision matrixes were constructed by 3 - degree measure for the dependent function set, then the AHPalgorithm was adopted to select dependent function suitable for matter - element complete informationmeasurement and define the relative weight factor. So, matter - element complete information can be quantifiedby the proposed algorithm. The proposed method is used for alarm system and its effectiveness is verified. Newapproach for information integration and decision support is developed by quantification algorithm of matter -element complet information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Decision-Making TechniquesFrench-language works237,207