MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2385760301

[Correlative study of the metabolic disorder of hippocampus and cerebral cortex and cognitive impairment in moderate to severe OSAHS patients].

2015· article· en· W2385760301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Binru Wang, Xianrong Xu, Gengtian Liang, Yingying Zhang, Li Liu, Juan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitionHippocampusObstructive sleep apneaHypopneaInternal medicineMedicineSleep apneaCognitive impairmentAnesthesiaAudiologyPolysomnographyApneaPsychiatry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To research the serum levels of BDNF, H2S and S-100β as metabolic product of hippocampus and cerebral cortex in moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS) patients before and after surgery, and to analyze their correlations with cognitive impairment. METHOD: Forty-four randomly selected diagnosed OSAHS patients were divided into two groups according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), 19 cases in cognitively normal group and 25 cases in cognitive dysfunction group. Cases in cognitive dysfunction group underwent UPPP oriented surgery, and received 6 months follow-up, 21 cases were remained as treament group, 4 cases lost. 19 cases of healthy subjects were randomly selected as the normal control group. All groups were detected for the serum BDNF, H2S and S-100β levels to analyze the correlations between the biochemical indexes and sleep disorders indexes, hypoxia levels and cognitive function scores. RESULT: (1) In the comparison between the treatment group and the normal control group regarding PSG monitoring results, the AHI, I + II, LA/HT and SLT90% indexes of OSAHS patients increased, and the III + IV phase, REM phase, MSaO2 and LSaO2 decreased. In the comparison between the cognitive dysfunction group and the cognitively normal group, the III + IV, REM and LSaO2 indexes of the cognitive dysfunction group decreased. (2) In the comparison between cognitive dysfunction group and cognitively normal group, and between the treatment group and the normal control group, BDNF and H2S levels increased and S-100β levels decreased, and the MoCA total scores, attention, memory/delayed recall scores decreased. (3) The correlation between biochemical indexes with PSG indexes was as follows. The serum BNDF and H2S levels were negatively correlated with AHI index. The serum BNDF and H2S levels were positively correlated with III + IV stage, REM stage and MSaO2 indexes. The S-100β level was positively correlated with AHI index, and S-100β levels were negatively correlated with III + IV stage, REM stage, MSaO2 and LSaO2 indexes. (4) The correlation between biochemical indexes and MoCA scores was as follows. The serum BNDF and H2S levels were positively correlated with MoCA total scores, attention, and memory/delayed recall scores. The serum S-100β levels were negatively correlated with MoCA total scores, attention and memory/ delayed recall scores. (5) The linear regression equation between MoCA total scores in cognitive dysfunction group of OSAHS patients and the serum BNDF, H2S and S-100β levels was as follows: Y(MoCA) = 40.131 + 0.22 X(BDNF) + 0.012 X(H2S)-0.647X(S-100β) (R2 = 0.461). CONCLUSION: OSAHS patients with sleep disorder and nocturnal hypoxemia might suffer from cognitive dysfunction in which attention and memory predominates. Serum BNDF, H2S and S-100β levels, which could indirectly reflect the metabolic abnormalities degree of hippocampus and cerebral cortex, are sensitive indicators of early cognitive dysfunction in OSAHS patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→