MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2385779105

Glass Transition of PET-CO_2 System via in Situ Optical Measurement

2010· article· en· W2385779105 on OpenAlexaff
Qinmin Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueGaofenzi cailiao kexue yu gongcheng · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceDifferential scanning calorimetryGlass transitionPlasticizerHydrostatic pressureIn situPolymerAnalytical Chemistry (journal)EthyleneWork (physics)Composite materialThermodynamicsChromatographyOrganic chemistryChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The change of the glass transition temperature Tg of poly-(ethylene-terephthalate)(PET),due to the dissolved CO2 has been measured as a function of the gas pressure p,using a novel in situ optical measuring apparatus.The results indicate that at 20 MPa,the Tg is depressed by 26 ℃.The depression in Tg is found to be linear with pressure,with dTg/dP of-1.3 ℃/MPa.To examine the accuracy and reliability of this method,the comparison of the result obtained by the apparatus at atmosphere pressure with that obtained by the standard differential scanning calorimetry(DSC)was made,and it showed that these two methods produced results within acceptable precision.Thus the method developed in this work is reliable to be used to measure Tg of polymers in SC-CO2.The Tg value at 30 MPa reported in the literature,however,departs markedly from the present investigation on PET/CO2 system,which implies that at a higher gas pressure an effect opposite to the plasticization becomes dominant due to the hydrostatic pressure exerted by the gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaofenzi cailiao kexue yu gongchengSame topicAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207