MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2385852617

Discussion on Compensation Mode for Power Distribution Network

2001· article· en· W2385852617 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDianli zidonghua shebei · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArc suppressionCompensation (psychology)GroundMode (computer interface)Electromagnetic coilPower (physics)Point (geometry)Arc (geometry)Control theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringComputer scienceElectric power systemElectronic engineeringEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsPsychologyMechanical engineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For non grounding system,the neutral point potential in normal running condition,the voltage raise of the non grounded phases in SLG and PPG incidents,and the neutral point potential raise in SLD incident are analyzed in detail.All these are related with the compensation mode for power distribution network.By detailed mathematical analysis,it is concluded that the excessive compensation mode with arc extinction coil is the best one for power distribution network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it