MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2385925129

Determination of Lead,Copper,Cadmium in Sugar Cane

2009· article· en· W2385925129 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSugarcane Cultivation and Processing
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSugarSugar caneCadmiumCopperHazardous wasteChemistryCaneEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industryWaste managementFood science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sugar cane is a gramineous plant,produced in the tropical and subtropical regions. It is the stuff of the white granulated sugar,brown granulated sugar,red sugar,etc. For the climate,soil,geological condition,environment is different,the hazardous substances and the hazardous elements in the sugar cane is also different. In this study,we determinated the three harmful elements lead,copper cadmium in sugar cane by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES) at the same time. The method is simple,rapid,accurate and suitable for sugar cane examination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSugarcane Cultivation and ProcessingFrench-language works237,207