MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386258562

THE LOOP-LINE DYNAMIC MEASURE OF FERROMAGNET HYSTERESIS

2001· article· en· W2386258562 on OpenAlexaff
Yao You

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Anhui Normal University · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerromagnetismHysteresisMeasure (data warehouse)MagnetOscillographLoop (graph theory)MagnetismCoercivityCondensed matter physicsMagnetic hysteresisResidualQuality (philosophy)Line (geometry)Magnetic fieldPhysicsComputer scienceMagnetizationOpticsMathematicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is introduced in the following essay that how to watch and measure the dynamic hysteresis loop-line,residual magnet and coercive force of ferromagnet through an oscillograph and illustrate by experimeat that the ferromagnet magnetism is relevant to its own quality and the wave and frequency of magnetic field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.824
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Anhui Normal UniversitySame topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207