MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386354492

The Emphatic Point of Education and Training for Current Migrant Workers' Occupational Health and Safety —Illustrated by the Example of the Practice of the People's Law School in Canada

2011· article· en· W2386354492 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shoutang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueAdult Education Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublicityOccupational safety and healthMigrant workersPeasantPublic relationsFace (sociological concept)Training (meteorology)PsychologyMedical educationPolitical scienceSociologyEconomic growthMedicineLawEconomicsSocial science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is an important way to guarantee migrant workers'right of occupational safety that we should strengthen the publicity of employers'and migrant workers'occupational health and safety consciousness and technical ability through the special eudcation.We should face up to related problems in current education and training and learn actively the successful education experience about the public legal education idea from the People's Law School of Canada,changing education concept,improving education mode and optimizing education effects to promote peasant workers'occupational health and safety education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdult Education QuarterlySame topicMedical Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207