MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386458101

Analysis on Salt and Alkaline Tolerance of Sixty-nine Maize Inbred Lines at Seedling Stage

2011· article· en· W2386458101 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeed · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInbred strainSalt (chemistry)SeedlingGerminationAlkali metalAgronomyProlineHorticultureBiologyChemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under alkali-stress condition(25 mmol/L Na2CO3) and salt-stress condition(100 mmol/L NaCl),sixty-nine maize inbred lines were cultivated.The five appropriate physiological and biochemical indicies were tested and used to evaluate salt-alkali tolerance of inbred lines,which included germination percentage,relative conductivity,SOD activity,MDA content and proline content.The main results were summarized as follows:(1)most of these materials had the same trends for five indicies in stress conditions;(2)salt-alkali tolerance between materials had obvious difference;(3)5 inbred lines with high salt-alkali tolerance,15 inbred lines with salt-alkali tolerance,32 inbred lines with medium salt-alkali tolerance,10 inbred lines with salt-alkali susceptible,7 inbred lines with high salt-alkali susceptible.The results would provide reference for screening salt-alkali tolerance germplasms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it