Vertical distribution character of soil inorganic phosphorus in mountain meadow system of WuGong Mountain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spatial distribution of soil inorganic phosphorus and the correlation between soil inorganic phosphorus and soil available phosphorus along the different altitudes(the altitude range from 1 600~1 900m)and different soil depths were analyzed in mountain meadow system of Wugong Mountain.The soil inorganic phosphorus(P)content ranged in 175.48~524.06mg·kg-1,significantly increased(P0.05)with the increase of altitude and decreased gradually with the increase of soil depth.There was a vertical distribution law and surface gathering character.The range of variation in water-soluble P,Al-P,Fe-P,O-P,Ca-P was 0.423~4.781,16.27~90.72,54.13~344.34,19.66~90.32,15.12~76.21mg·kg-1,respectively.There were also vertical distribution and surface gathering character in each proportions of inorganic phosphorus.The percentage of Fe-P was the highest which followed by Al-P,O-P,Ca-P and water soluble P.There was a significantly positive correlations between soil available P and Al-P which suggest that Al-P was the potential resource for available P in this area.This research revealed the spatial distribution of soil inorganic P and the correlation between available P and soil inorganic P,determinate the resource of soil P which provided a guidance for vegetation restoration in mountain meadow ecosystem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it