MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386508801

Comparative Analysis of Photosynthetic Characteristics of Three Introduced Poplars and Three Native Poplars

2010· article· en· W2386508801 on OpenAlexaff
Fanjuan Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueXibu linye kexue · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChlorophyll fluorescencePhotosynthesisSalicaceaeTranspirationBotanyChemistryPhotosynthetic efficiencyWater-use efficiencyFluorescenceHorticultureWoody plantBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The gas exchange,chlorophyll fluorescence parameter of three introduced poplars and three native poplars were determined under natural conditions.Three study introduced poplars were Finland poplar A21(Populus tremula×Populus tremuloides),Finland poplar 16(Populus tremula×Populus tremuloides)and Jiayang(Populus deloides Marsh×Populus nigra L.),and three study native poplars were Xiaoqingyang(Populus pseudo-simonii),Xiaoyeyang(Populus simonii Carr.) and Xing'anyang(Populus hsinganica).The determination results showed that the net photosynthetic rates(Pn)of the introduced poplars were significantly higher than three native poplars,transpiration rate(Tr)and water use efficiency(WUE)of the introduced poplars were also higher than the native poplars.These results indicated that the phytosynthetic capacity of the introduced poplars were promising,and the efficiency of light and water absorption were also high.The mean values of the initial fluorescence(Fo),maximal fluorescence(Fm),actual efficiency of primary conversion of light energy of PS II(F′v/F′m),stable fluorescence(Fs),minimum fluorescence of dark adaptation(Fo)and maximum fluorescence of light adaptation(F′m)of introduced poplars were higher than those of native poplars,but the mean values of the variable fluorescence(Fv),potential efficiency of primary conversion of light energy of PS II(Fv/Fw),the ratio of variable fluorescence to initial fluorescence(Fv/Fo),non-photochemical quenching coefficient(NPQ),quantum yield of PS II electron transport and photochemical quenching coefficient(qP)were lower than that of native poplar.Correlation analysis among photosynthetic parameters showed that there were significant positive correlations between Pn and Tr,Ci and Tr,Fm and Fo,Fv/Fo and Fv/Fm,PS II and Fo(P0.01),and between PSII and Fm,F′v/F′m and Fv/Fo(P0.05).However,there were significantly negative correlations between Fv/Fo and Fo,Fv/Fm and Fo,NPQ and Fv/Fo(P0.01),and between qP and F′v/F′m(P0.05).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXibu linye kexueSame topicEnvironmental and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207