The Current Situation and the Pedigree Analysis of South China Tiger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
South China tiger(Panthera tigris amoyensi) is on the edge of extinct.The wild individual of tigers is rarely seen in the field.A total of 53 individuals of South China tigers are kept in 22 zoos in China at present.The potential breeding ability of the 53 tigers have been limited because they are kept in different zoos.It is a great waste for the precious resources.According to the pedigree,the 53 tigers can be divided into two groups,Shanghai branch and Guiyang branch.Tigers belonging to Shanghai branch own excellent multiple-child gene while its descendants living ability are weaker.Tigers belong to Guiyang branch have low child-bearing rate gene,but their offsprings have a stronger ability to survive than those produced by Shanghai branch's tigers.A gene bank should be established for the Guiyang branch's tigers because there are only 6 individuals available in zoos and their gene has a good quality to be kept and studied.Age structure of the tiger population in zoos in good.Adult and young ones compose 62^3% and 28^3% of the captive tiger population.Elder ones which can not give birth only consist a small percentage in the captive tigers.A promising increasing of captive breeding tigers can be predicted in the near future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".