MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2386662296

Detection of BAALC in patients with acute myeloid leukemia by real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction

2010· article· en· W2386662296 on OpenAlexaff
Hongbo Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bengbu Medical College · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyeloid leukemiaReverse transcriptasePeripheral blood mononuclear cellMedicinePolymerase chain reactionLeukemiaReal-time polymerase chain reactionReverse transcription polymerase chain reactionSYBR Green IComplementary DNAAcute leukemiaMolecular biologyMessenger RNAImmunologyBiologyGeneIn vitroGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective:To detect the mRNA expression of brain and acute leukemia,cytoplasmic(BAALC) in perpheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMC),BAALC of patients with acute myeloid leukemia(AML) by comparative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction(RQ-PCR) with SYBR Green.Methods:PBMC was obtained from 12 patients with AML and 5 healthy donors,from which total RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed into cDNA.The leukemia cell lines K562 cells was selected as positive control.The expression of BAALC was detected by RQ-PCR with SYBR Green assay.Results:The BAALC mRNA could not be detected in PBMC of healthy donors.However,in 12 patients with AML,it was highly expressed in 8 of them.The relative values were 0.8-5.6 compared with K562 cells.Conclusions:The expression of BAALC in PBMC of patients with AML could be detected by SYBR Green comparative RQ-PCR.It was a steady,sensitive and reliable assay method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bengbu Medical CollegeSame topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsFrench-language works237,207