The Clinical Analysis of Anxiety Depression in Cardiovascular Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To study the clinical characteristics and treatment of anxiety depression in car diovascular patients. Methods:The clinical data about 1047 cases of cardiovascular patients with anxiety depression were retrospectively reviewe d. Result: 13 4 percent of cardiovascular patients was complicated w ith anxiety depression. The main symptoms were similar to angina pectoris and to left heart failure. The patients might occur arrhythmias. The hypertension comp licated with anxiety depression were poor tolerance to blood pressure elevating and in these patients the proportion of patients with the blood pressure circadi an lost was higher. They responded badly to only using cardiovascular drugs trea tment and additional administration of antianxiety and antidepressant drugs was effective. Conclusion: The anxiety depression is common in cardiovas cular patients. It is important to pay more attention to identify the symptoms o f anxiety depression, which is similar to cardiac disease. The administration of cardiovascular drugs adding antianxiety and antidepressant drugs is safe and ef fective in treatment of cardiovascular patients with anxiety depression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".