Design on cruise missiles positioning system based on geomagnetic field disturbances detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to realize wide range detection,accurate identification,precise positioning on cruise missiles,a system for cruise missiles recognition and positioning based on magnetic field disturbance detection is proposed.According to the law of Biot-Sand the Laval law and electromagnetic induction,design a method for inversion feature information of cruise missile such as position and distance by magnetic field disturbances,and establish corresponding mathematical model.Through simulation analysis,the intensity of magnetic field perturbation depends primarily on distances between the measured object and the magnetic detector,size and velocity of the measured object.By Matlab simulation,the function relationship diagram of intensity of the magnetic field disturbance and three parameters is given.Experiment adopts metal column analog proportionally physical process that cruise missiles flying through constant magnetic field,get intensity of magnetic field turbulence under different conditions of different distance,different speed generated from measured metal column,inverses the characteristic information of the measured object.Experiments show that the principle is feasible,detection range and precision can be adjusted according to specific requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it