Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluated the clinical efficacy of the radiofrequency ablation for pathological scar. Methods We treated the hyperplastic scar of 36 patients with radiofrequency ablation. All of the patients had were diagnosed with syringomas for at least 1 years and the scars were in the mature period. Two similar hyperplastic scar regions are chosen in each patient for self-comparison. The treatment group was treated by radiofrequency ablation and for the control group no any management was performed. The vancouver scar scale was tested in the 6th,12th month after the operation. Results The vancouver scar scale of the treatment group is lower than the control group in the 6th,12th month after operation,and the difference has statistical significance( P 0. 05). After be treated by radiofrequency ablation,the color,thickness and softness of scar had been significantly improved. Conclusion After be treated by RF ablation,the color of pathological scars would be fade,the thickness be flattening,and the contracture be alleviate. It is an ideal method to dispel scars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".